.
Feedback

Nassau Legislature Passes 2012 Budget

Partisan vote calls for additional $81M in union concessions and privatization of Long Island Bus.

Nassau County has its budget for 2012, a $2.63 billion spending plan passed along party lines that calls for the privatization of the county bus system, closing two police precincts and the potential for hundreds of layoffs for county employees.

“This is not a feel-good budget,” Majority Leader Peter Schmitt, R-Massapequa, said Sunday night during a special meeting of the county legislature. “But is is a budget that is real, one that deals with the problems of the county and a budget which will begin to move the county in the direction that will ultimately ensure long-term fiscal solvency.”

The 11-8 vote, which was passed with numerous additional Republican amendments, including $51 million in potential union layoffs and about $80 million more in concessions.

“Tonight is a vote on a budget that consists of initiatives that are going to require a hearing after we pass the budget to realize the savings that the budget is supposedly coming up with,” Legis. Judy Jacobs, D-Woodbury, said referring to Long Island Bus and the precinct closures.

“It’s disingenuous to put forward a budget document saying there’s going to be shared services or shared responsibility,” Legis. Kevan Abrahams, D-Hempstead, said. “I really boggle at how this actually saves money today not knowing how this legislation is going to break in a couple of weeks when there actually is a hearing.”

Schmitt and Republicans have promised to hold hearings on the privatization of the Long Island Bus as well as the specific precincts which have been targeted for closure, but that have not been identified.

“We’re going to have a busy November and December, that’s the way legislature is supposed to work,” Schmitt said.

“This is not the way budgeting is supposed to work,” Jacobs shot back. “To get a budget that does not make sense to me, that doesn’t have a fallback, is not in the best interest (of the residents).”

The Democratic amendments offered called for no layoffs to union members or tax increase but relied upon using $56 million in rainy day funds – approximately half of the county’s reserve fund – something the Republican majority was unwilling to consider, as according to Schmitt, Nassau’s bond rating would drop significantly.

“You overseeing our bond rating is like Dracula overseeing the blood bank,” said Legis. David Denenberg, D-Merrick.

The budget relies on an additional $450 million in borrowing over the next four years as a way to clear out remaining property tax judgments. The borrowing was approved by NIFA, the state control board overseeing Nassau’s finances. Schmitt described the bonds as “transitional borrowing” as the county moves to a pay-as-you-go assessment system.

“I understand that you don’t like the direction that we’re taking the county in,” Schmitt said. “I understand that you would much rather go with tax increases and not have to make some of these tough cuts that are called for to make.”

Nassau union presidents have come out heavily against the proposals, which CSEA President Jerry Laricchiuta had stated would “destroy” the county and amount to 700 layoffs, rendering entire departments unable to function.

“I believe this vote today is a vote for layoffs,” Laricchiuta said. “It does matter if they have separate vote for layoffs, but I believe that this vote makes $51 million in layoffs essential and then the other $81 million in concessions they’re going to weigh against layoffs.”

When combined with wage freezes imposed by NIFA, the total amount the union is affected by is approximately $150 million.

“What they’re not going to say is don’t call 911, or don’t expect the streets to get plowed and if that traffic light’s out, it’s going to stay out for a few days, and God forbid anybody in our family has to go to social services,” Laricchiuta said.

Lorraine DeVita November 2, 2011 at 01:30 pm
Perhaps a list of the companies doing business with the county and the TOH is needed also to see if work was done on a bid basis or if it was handed to the good ol boys... Does any publication or organization have the b---ls to do the leg work and publish this information?
James M. November 2, 2011 at 01:37 pm
Actually it is true. Many police officers from NYC after 5 years (NYC Pension start) take civil service exams in Nassau, Suffolk and Jersey and then work there some even use that 5 years to go out of state. Their experience allows them to start with a higher salary. Now remember just because they qualify for a pension in NYC they do not receive their pension until the retirement age. Personally I see no reason not to hire experienced police officers.
Here's the real scam. If you are in the military, you get a pension. Once out you work for the city or state for 20 years and get another pension. Then you work at the TSA (Federal level) and get another pension so that by the time you are 65 and assume military at 18 to 25 and then 20 years each you would retire with 3 pension checks at least 50% each. And each job gives preferences for veterans.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 01:43 pm
Realtors regularly under assess a home to get it sold quickly for their commission. Hence why the bank requires a certified assessor when you get a mortgage.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 01:46 pm
When you made your arguments did you take into account the houses sold at foreclosure? When a certified assessor values your home they do not give a lot of weight to these types of sales.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 01:52 pm
No there won't be. No tax increases while the Republicans are in control. They'll just keep borrowing and implementing one time revenues and cuts until they are ousted by the people then blame the Democrats for increasing taxes trying to pay for all this borrowing and balancing the budget.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 02:04 pm
What businesses do you promote? They promoted Charles Wang and the Islanders.... No new jobs. The gov't cut taxes for 10 years..... no new jobs. Cut taxes on businesses.....no new jobs. If gov't gets involved in business either the business complains about gov't telling them what to do and increasing expenses or the taxpayers complain about footing the bill to help businesses that never seem to give back to the community (or live in the community for that matter).
Robert Demarco November 2, 2011 at 02:08 pm
The role of government in job creation should be to offer reasonable zoning, reasonable regulation, and maybe some tax incentive to locate here. An office building or warehouse full of employees helps stores and other nearby businesses. That is all government can do. They cannot actually "create" jobs.
Mac November 2, 2011 at 02:08 pm
J do you really think the democrats are any better? Didnt Suozzi use the same strategy of borrowing that Mangano just used but borrowed more. Didnt Suozzi say no tax increase but then every permit and fee went up in the county? They are all different versions of the same coin. Bipartisanship and working for the people really doesnt exist in either party.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 02:09 pm
Maybe politicians should recuse themselves if they have received donations from businesses or people that would benefit from the legislation
Mac November 2, 2011 at 02:12 pm
j Marshall thats a great one recuse themselves :) Who would run the government then? All these politicians get money.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 02:15 pm
Yeah I know but I was thinking about how to put integrity back into gov't and it was the best thing I could come up with.
James M. November 2, 2011 at 02:17 pm
Define resonable? We have at least 2 brand new office buildings on 110 that don't seem to have tenents and many of the office buildings on 110 are half empty. All of those builders received incentives to be there and it created some short term construction jobs. That's all.
Robert Demarco November 2, 2011 at 02:21 pm
I remember when Gregory Peterson was a member of the zoning board of appeals, and also represented clients as an attorney before the same board. He was asked about that being a conflict of interest. His response was that he recuses himself from voting when the applicant is one of his clients. I felt so much better after reading that (right).
James M. November 2, 2011 at 02:53 pm
Absolutely agree. It's just the ridiculous Conservative and Republican radio ads I've been hearing on the way to work keep touting how they haven't increased taxes.
Mac November 2, 2011 at 03:07 pm
Dont forget the new empty buildings in Hicksville on 106 and 107.
Kevin November 2, 2011 at 04:59 pm
Well, the politically appointed Board of Zoning Appeals approved with special exceptions and varianses two Strip Club owners to open a Strip Club within feet of children.They had concerns so they gave the Two Strip Club owners a PERMANENT license so the community would have no recourse. We fortunately caught it but none of those BZA members have been asked to step down. Maybe this is because the President of the Wantagh Republican Club wrote a character reference for the Two Strip Club owners to the BZA. Something has to change in the Town of Hempstead and Nassau county.
Robert Demarco November 2, 2011 at 05:09 pm
Hi, Kevin. I also noticed that Kate Murray, who did nothing to help you guys, was front and center when you won the appeal and the pictures were being taken. That is her style: do nothing to help, then take credit for the victory. I live in Hudes' district, but I hope that Claudia Borecky sends that shill Angie Cullin into retirement.
Lorraine DeVita November 4, 2011 at 10:35 am
Angie is REAL? thought she was just a card board cut out that they propped up for photo ops!
terry November 4, 2011 at 10:54 am
Kevin, I actually remember seeing Ms Murray and a few other elected officials at the protests during the summer. I also remember seeing Ms Murray and Ms Cullin testifying at the Board of Appeals Hearing.
It was interesting to see Mr Port suddenly show up for a protest a week before election day for the first time, but I'm sure it was just an oversight......did he also miss speaking at the board of zoning appeals too? And Lorraine, I'm glad to see you care about patronage jobs, exactly where does Claudia work..........
Lorraine DeVita November 4, 2011 at 11:50 am
Claudia? Am i supposed to know WHO that is?
Robert Demarco November 4, 2011 at 12:07 pm
Hi, Lorraine. She's the person running against Cullin. She has been active in the issues with Aqua Water and the strip club in Wantagh.
Lorraine DeVita November 4, 2011 at 12:17 pm
Robert, Hi! Thanks for the info,obviously I'm not familiar with her stand on either -what are her positions.
Catherine Mary November 4, 2011 at 12:43 pm
Lorraine a Google search on any of the candidates will give you information you might find interesting. It would probably be less biased than info you might get from a person who is supporting one candidate over another (no offense intended to anyone here). Especially as it seems that negative campaigning is preferred option with candidates these days. If you want to find out why you might want to vote for someone as opposed to why you DON"T want to vote for someone else, this kind of search might give you more to consider. It might also turn up things we all weren't meant to know :-). Gotta love Google
Lorraine DeVita November 4, 2011 at 02:02 pm
Cathy, google is my prime source of info and ya you DO have to love it.. .. to be truthful i was being very lazy and under caffinated and wanted an easy way out to get a brief synopsis.. lol.. off to google i go! thanks! hagd!
Susan November 4, 2011 at 02:17 pm
If you have any questions for the candidates send them an e-mail. That's what I did yesterday. I rec'd a quick response.
Robert Demarco November 4, 2011 at 03:11 pm
She has a website Claudiaborecky.com. She is not running in my district so I don't know specifics about her. I am in the Aqua service area and close enough to the strip club in question to know that she was involved in these issues.
Patrick M November 4, 2011 at 04:37 pm
I was looking for updates on whether the Tackapausha Museum will be closed or not, so I left messages and emailed three different local legislators last weekend and have yet to receive a response.
Tideline November 4, 2011 at 04:42 pm
Patrick, who were the local Legislators ? Enquiring minds want to know. Sounds like you found out what response you get when you call D. Ford's office. Nothing.
Robert Demarco November 4, 2011 at 06:22 pm
I sent an e-mail to the Teammurray2011 address to politely ask some questions about the Animal Shelter. I even stated that I am not an animal rights activist. The questions I asked, however, are the ones the have been avoiding. I really do not expect a response. C'mon Kate, surprise me. Make my day.
Patrick M November 5, 2011 at 05:38 pm
I emailed and called Dunne, Denenberg and Schmitt. I finally got an answer from Schmitt's office, but it was "I don't know"...
Today on newsday.com: http://www.newsday.com/news/mangano-2-nassau-museums-won-t-be-closing-1.3297741

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mineola Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Geoffrey Walter (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 10:03 am
I do not know what you mean by a "senior building." Please be more specific. If you areRead More talking about the Winston-Churchill project and not a senior assisted living facility, we have a small update here: http://mineola.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/flood-mitigation-apartment-projects-moving-forward
SLJ May 29, 2013 at 08:40 pm
Funny how neither comment addressed John's point. A good one BTW...
JOHN HERLING May 30, 2013 at 04:26 pm
Vincent - I don't care what the cost per child is. The actual costs are for teacher andRead More administrator salaries, benefits, pensions etc. Patti - many of the parents and children are living in apartments and houses, some legally and some not, but definitely not in houses that they own. SLJ - Thank you!
Vincent June 3, 2013 at 07:31 am
Ms. Purdy: This is also a act that Mr. Herling should be refering to. An article in the WillistonRead More Times dated Friday May 24, 2013 states: "The Herricks Board of Education is hopeful that a bill drafted by state Sen. Jack Martins(R-Min) to financially penalize landlords who create illegal apartments will stop the practice in the Hericks school district. The bill in it's current form would empower the school district or a municipality in a school district to bring legal action against a landlord who creates an "unapproved conversion" of a single family or two family house to recoup the expense of educating children in those living situations in district shools." And if you don't think the same is happening in the Mineola School District I don't know what to say other than it's your tax money.