.
Feedback

Schmitt Calls for Ethics Investigations of NIFA Board Members

Majority leader says county funds in chairman’s bank creates a conflict.

Nassau County Legislative Majority Leader Peter Schmitt believes the Nassau County Interim Finance Authority's (NIFA) takeover of the county's finances is nothing but a “coup” and board members have something other than the county’s best interest at heart.

At a press conference in his office Monday morning, the Massapequa Republican accused each of NIFA's six members of casting politically motivated votes to gain oversight over the county’s budget.

“This is not the same board,” Schmitt said. “Believe me, Ron Stack is no Frank Zarb,” referring to the current and a past NIFA chairman, respectively.

Schmitt’s singling out of Stack stems from his hiring by Wells Fargo Bank after the county had deposited $82 million in funds under the Suozzi administration. Nassau had made the deposit to Wells Fargo in May 2009 and Stack joined the bank the following month.

“This guy has a conflict of interest, I believe, it’s my opinion,” Schmitt said. “I think it’s the height of irresponsibility on his part not to have taken steps to address that conflict.” Schmitt is calling for the county to withdraw the funds from Wells Fargo.

When asked if removing the money from Stack’s bank would remove the ethical conflict, Schmitt said that “we don’t know because these are operating funds of the county and as much as I’d like to see it, I doubt very much that we’re going to be able to... move (the funds). If you stop robbing liquor stores, that doesn’t mean that you didn’t rob liquor stores.”

Schmitt did not specify which statute any of the NIFA board members might be violating in their code of ethics, available on the NIFA website. Representatives for both NIFA and Stack have indicated that there has been no conflict of interest as Stack’s position of NIFA chairman was cleared by the Commission of Public Integrity.

“If this stands, he has a voice and ultimately a vote in determining where county money goes,” Schmitt said, referring to Stack. “Shouldn’t we know what he stands to profit from that? Even indirectly?”

Schmitt said he has also raised the ethics questions through the commission last June and his office indicated that hearings would be scheduled for sometime in mid-February. The majority leader also railed against his Democratic counterpart, Minority Leader Diane Yatauro, D-Glen Cove.

According to a NIFA document issued on Jan. 26 when the board imposed its takeover, County Executive Ed Mangano stated there was an agreement in place with Democratic county legislators over borrowing for property tax settlements but on a conference call the minority leader made no such indication an agreement existed.

“We had a written agreement,” Schmitt said. “The same bonding which has been done for the last 10 years. Unbeknownst to me, the minority leader wrote a letter to NIFA two weeks ago renouncing that deal. Now we have to start making budget cuts to offset that cost.”

In a statement, Yatauro called Schmitt’s comments “inappropriate and harsh,” adding that both Mangano and Schmitt “failed to respond responsibly and professionally” with the NIFA takeover. Yatauro also asked that both sides “sit down calmly during this control period and show how we will balance the 2011 budget, anything less is irresponsible and unprofessional.”

NIFA has also questioned various aspects of Nassau’s fiscal plan, including projections of sales tax and property tax income in the still sluggish economy, asking for a number of contingency plans which have bristled members of the administration.

Schmitt called NIFA's predictions “laughable on its face. The elected officials – not the appointed bureaucrats – have every right to manage the problem.”

Schmitt admitted that Nassau will most likely not realize savings through union concessions and there are corresponding cuts the county can make to keep the budget in balance. Mangano had recently submitted six letters to NIFA detailing various contingencies for his 2011 budget, which the agency says does not project a balanced budget and indicates a $176 million deficit.

Mangano has maintained that his 2011 budget is balanced and is suing NIFA over control of the county, indicating that the board wants him to raise property taxes.

“By saying you can’t use contingencies, you can’t use that, you can’t use the other thing, which is what they say in their decree, the only thing left is the property tax,” Schmitt said. “Well I’m here to push back on that. They’re not getting it, period. I don’t care what they do.”

Any property tax increase would have to first be passed through the legislature.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mineola Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Lisa Rosen February 5, 2011 at 11:17 pm
When will Peter Schmitt understand he is part of the problem and not part of the solution!
Eddie February 5, 2011 at 11:30 pm
It's about time the present administration took on the constant assault from the socialists.
Mangano already reduced my tax assessments by over $100,000. That translates, I hope, to several thousand a year more for my family. The socialists were dumped for a reason. They should leave gracefully. They're not wanted here.
Claudia Borecky February 6, 2011 at 12:04 am
Socialists???? I have absolutely no idea what you mean by that. The past administration produced balanced budgets every year they were in office because they believed in pay as you go policies. They did not borrow extensively for daily county operations. They were fiscally conservative and had fiscally responsible budgets. This new administration fails to live up to its campaign promises. It is incapable of coming up with a balanced budget. And if your assessment when down by $100,000, it does not mean that your taxes miraculously went down under Mangano's year in office. It only means that our property values went down (which has nothing to do with either administration, but reflects a recession). If you are paying $1,000 less, it only means that your neighbor is paying $1,000 more. Shame on you if you get pleasure in that fact. We all are feeling strangled by our taxes, but it has nothing to do with our assessment. Look to 68% of our tax bill. You will realize that even though the Town of Hempstead is taxing us in every year that they are not running for office, the county's budget has remained constant, 68$ % of your bill is being raised by your school district. When you go to the polls in May, keep that in mind.
Max February 6, 2011 at 12:05 am
It is such a huge surprise that the Republicans are unable to both balance the budget and deliver the goods to their political cronies. They did such a terrific job nationally and the last time they controlled Nassau County. Buy one ounce of silver - help end the global bankster occupation.
Captain Kirk February 6, 2011 at 12:14 am
Is this the same Peter Schmitt who tried to raise his own and other legislators salary as soon as the repubicans gained control of the legislature? He wants an ethic investigation? What's the old story of the people that live in glass houses?
Robert Demarco February 6, 2011 at 02:06 am
Peter schmidt has no shame. He was an obstructionist when the Democrats were in power, and he became a greedy pig when the Republicans took control.
Bob Rabey February 6, 2011 at 09:43 am
Reading this whole thing, I can only relate this to two dogs fighting over the same bone. Besides, aren't we getting away from the REAL issues? We all know are taxes are too high, there are no jobs that pay anything worth while, and our younger generation is leaving this state for good. What a mess. What it boils down to is that there are less and less paying in to the system, so yeah, there's less money. Now throw in to that mix the greed of our "elected representatives" and what are you left with?
For example, we all know about the Town of Hempstead and the way they have run things. BUT, don't we (the voters) keep sending the same rotten people back once they're up for re-election? Has Kate Murray ever ran against anyone? Is there anyone out there ready, willing and able to take her on? I know there are those who would "like" to, but who has the money needed to run against that hugh political party? So, what are we to do? The general public feels helpless. They feel their vote means nothing. Besides all I hear is "vote for who?" Still some are following their kids, and just leaving the state. If you're nearing retirement age, you'd better, or get eaten alive in taxes.
Captain Kirk February 6, 2011 at 08:22 pm
I'll vote for Claudia!
Tom Baxter April 6, 2011 at 11:29 am
In response, NIFA members called for a sobriety investigation of Pete Schmitt in order to ascertain the number of drunk driving experiences he's been involved in/
JOET*GUITAR April 9, 2011 at 03:16 pm
AS CAPTIAN KIRK--I VOTE FOR***CLAUDIA***
JOET*GUITAR April 9, 2011 at 03:17 pm
GET RID OF KATE MURRAY PLEASE
Scott Clarke April 9, 2011 at 04:05 pm
The county and town taxes are miniscule compared to the school taxes. To be fighting over the small stuff creates a distraction away from what has choked the nassau homeowner. Their kids have grown and left the island. They have no chance of being able to start their careers (unless they are teachers) and afford to live here with these outrageous school taxes. Perhaps they can take each town, and subdivide the school district into two separate districts, hire two separate superintendents, two business asst supts, etc, etc. Think of all the new jobs that will be created! Useless unnecessary jobs, but since when did that matter? Spending other peoples' money is painless. The tax base is shrinking because people are fleeing. THAT is the problem for the county. But the root cause of the shrinking base is the school taxes. Voting on teh school budget accomplishes nothing. The austerity budget will be so close to the proposed budget, that the vote result won't matter. The only cuts that will be made will be to the childrens services; not the personnel costs. Better get that for sale sign up before your neighbor does.
Robert Demarco April 9, 2011 at 05:13 pm
How about an ethics investigation of Peter Schmitt? This guy is a greedy pig and one of the reasons that Nassau is in this predicament.
Scott Clarke April 9, 2011 at 07:08 pm
LOL, it's schmitts fault for the predicament of the property taxes. Spoken like a true liberal. Why not blame bush while you're at it. Or Nixon. Or Lincoln. ALL politicians today are self serving crooks. It's not limited to any one party. Your partisanship is showing. Nice name calling though. Very well thought out argument on your part.
Robert Demarco April 10, 2011 at 11:45 am
Hey, Scott, I'm no Liberal. I vote for Peter King, who I admire and respect, and usually vote Republican on a national level. In Nassau and Hemstead, however, I will never vote for a Republican. I have watched them ruin the County, and run the Town like it is their personal feifdom. Schmitt is representative of the problems with these people, but he is by no means the only problem. He is front and center because of his position.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Geoffrey Walter (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 01:12 pm
Laura, thanks - be sure to add this to our map:Read More http://mineola.patch.com/groups/weekend-planner/p/holding-a-yard-sale-in-mineola-add-it-to-our-map_34c9bf9b
Geoffrey Walter (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 10:03 am
I do not know what you mean by a "senior building." Please be more specific. If you areRead More talking about the Winston-Churchill project and not a senior assisted living facility, we have a small update here: http://mineola.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/flood-mitigation-apartment-projects-moving-forward