.
Feedback

More Wells to be Added to Station Plaza Flood Project

Contractor’s reported low bid allows for more work to be done.

Work continues to progress on the at Station Plaza.

Mineola Superintendent of Public Works Tom Rini reported that as of the June 6 meeting of the parking field no. 1 has been fully excavated.

The original plan also called for the installation of 14 10-ft. by 20 ft. diffusion wells, 10 of which are currently installed with the interconnected piping for parking field no. 7.

“We did run into a couple of problems with this project,” Rini reported to the village board, noting excavators encountered 2-feet of earth which was not suitable to be put back into the excavation since it would not cause proper drainage. Below that layer crews found sand, which was able to remain in the excavation.

“The problem is having a two-foot excavation like that, there’s a cost of taking it out and if we did allow it in the contract – it’s a unit priced contract – we did estimate a quantity, however, it wasn’t quite as much as two feet; we didn’t really anticipate having to have to remove two feet of unsuitable material,” Rini said.

There is also a cost relating to bringing in the material necessary to create a sub-grade for the new parking lot. The four remaining existing wells in the parking field no. 7 in front of the elevator and closer to “are not draining,” Rini added. “Basically they’re a catch at this point and they run.”

The original estimated cost of the project as $600,000, but no credence was given to replace those four basins due to the rising cost. However, the contractor did bid at such a low dollar amount that Rini recommended to the board install an additional two wells in the area.

“We would leave those existing basins – especially the two right up against that elevator touchdown for the railroad; I really don’t want to be excavating down 25. feet right next to that,” he said. “They are a solid structure, they will hold water and allow water under head pressure – rain – to pass through.”

The the new costs will add $32,839 to the cost of the project: $8,888.50 for the pools and the piping while the other additional items will total $23,950.50.

“You’re never going to see a price like this again for a 10 ft. by 20 ft. diffusion well, two of them with interconnecting pipe,” Rini said. “It will give us additional capacity, additional storage and additional diffusion in that area at a very good price.”

The board approved the additional expenditures associated with the expansion of the project.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mineola Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Geoffrey Walter (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 10:03 am
I do not know what you mean by a "senior building." Please be more specific. If you areRead More talking about the Winston-Churchill project and not a senior assisted living facility, we have a small update here: http://mineola.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/flood-mitigation-apartment-projects-moving-forward
SLJ May 29, 2013 at 08:40 pm
Funny how neither comment addressed John's point. A good one BTW...
JOHN HERLING May 30, 2013 at 04:26 pm
Vincent - I don't care what the cost per child is. The actual costs are for teacher andRead More administrator salaries, benefits, pensions etc. Patti - many of the parents and children are living in apartments and houses, some legally and some not, but definitely not in houses that they own. SLJ - Thank you!
Vincent June 3, 2013 at 07:31 am
Ms. Purdy: This is also a act that Mr. Herling should be refering to. An article in the WillistonRead More Times dated Friday May 24, 2013 states: "The Herricks Board of Education is hopeful that a bill drafted by state Sen. Jack Martins(R-Min) to financially penalize landlords who create illegal apartments will stop the practice in the Hericks school district. The bill in it's current form would empower the school district or a municipality in a school district to bring legal action against a landlord who creates an "unapproved conversion" of a single family or two family house to recoup the expense of educating children in those living situations in district shools." And if you don't think the same is happening in the Mineola School District I don't know what to say other than it's your tax money.